not really
Heres the difference:
Nouva:
[highlight=red]Dry(without oil and fuel) 103kg
Wet(with oil and a full fuel tank) 108kg[/highlight]
Engine Performance
Engine type Forced air cooled 4-stroke, SOHC
Cylinder arrangement Forward-inclined single cylinder
Displacement 113cm3
Bore & stroke 50.0X57.9mm
Compression ratio 8.8 : 1
[highlight=red]Maximum horse power 6.54kw(8000r/min)
Maximum torque 8.62N.m(7000r/min)[/highlight]
Starting system type Electric starter and kickstarter
Lubrication system Wet sump
Radiator capacity(including all routes) ---
Engine oil capacity 0.9L
Fuel
Air filter type Dry Paper
Fuel tank capacity 4.8L
[highlight=red]Carburetor Type/Fuel supply BS25[/highlight]
Mio:
[highlight=red]Dry(without oil and fuel) 92kg
Wet(with oil and a full fuel tank) 95kg[/highlight]
Engine Performance
Engine type Forced air cooled 4-stroke, SOHC
Cylinder arrangement Single cylinder
Displacement 113cm3
Bore & stroke 50.0X57.9mm
Compression ratio 8.8 : 1
[highlight=red]Maximum horse power 5.98kw(8000r/min)
Maximum torque 7.53N.m(6500r/min)[/highlight]
Starting system type Electric starter and kickstarter
Lubrication system Wet sump
Radiator capacity(including all routes) ---
Engine oil capacity 0.9L
Fuel
Air filter type Dry Paper
Fuel tank capacity 3.7 L
[highlight=red]Carburetor Type/Fuel supply NCV24[/highlight]
an obvious point, they are not the exact same engine. the Nouva has a bigger horse power and torq., weight difference between both bikes, the carb is different between the bikes. In theory the Nouva should use more fuel than the Mio because of weight and horse power increase.
just my 34 cents